Cisco 300-420 Exam Dumps, Practice Test Questions

That option concerns a separate design case: A design extends SDA fabric across buildings on a WAN with 1500-byte MTU and assumes local campus performance will continue unchanged. The relevant control here is: Plan ECMP based on actual per-flow hashing and application sensitivity rather than guaranteed per-packet load balance.

That option concerns a separate design case: A routed-access campus needs equal-cost forwarding to two distribution routers while keeping each VLAN local to one wiring closet. The relevant control here is: Plan ECMP based on actual per-flow hashing and application sensitivity rather than guaranteed per-packet load balance.

That option concerns a separate design case: An SD-Access architect assumes the fabric's LISP control plane transports all user packets like a data-plane tunnel. The relevant control here is: Plan ECMP based on actual per-flow hashing and application sensitivity rather than guaranteed per-packet load balance.

That option concerns a separate design case: An OSPF deployment puts all 600 remote access switches into area 0 and floods changes to every site. The relevant control here is: Reserve infrastructure and growth ranges separately within a hierarchical IPv4 and IPv6 allocation plan.

That option concerns a separate design case: A branch engineer redistributes a static default route into EIGRP and advertises it to every site, overriding the intended hub defaults. The relevant control here is: Reserve infrastructure and growth ranges separately within a hierarchical IPv4 and IPv6 allocation plan.

That option concerns a separate design case: A new IPv6-only client subnet must access a legacy IPv4-only web endpoint through an enterprise gateway. The relevant control here is: Reserve infrastructure and growth ranges separately within a hierarchical IPv4 and IPv6 allocation plan.

That option concerns a separate design case: An enterprise's primary WAN circuit fails but BGP route withdrawal is delayed while the underlay interface remains up. The relevant control here is: Add genuinely diverse WAN transport and edge device options consistent with the recovery requirement.

That option concerns a separate design case: An SD-WAN fabric routes guest traffic into the production VPN because a new edge reused the corporate service VPN identifier. The relevant control here is: Add genuinely diverse WAN transport and edge device options consistent with the recovery requirement.

That option concerns a separate design case: A branch uses IPsec overlay on broadband with 1400-byte effective MTU, but an application sends 1500-byte DF-set packets and stalls. The relevant control here is: Add genuinely diverse WAN transport and edge device options consistent with the recovery requirement.

That option concerns a separate design case: A routing telemetry client assumes every operational counter supports on-change updates and receives no updates on one platform. The relevant control here is: Subscribe only to required model paths with appropriate update mode and cadence.

That option concerns a separate design case: An NOC polls every router with SNMP once every ten minutes and misses 30-second interface utilization spikes. The relevant control here is: Subscribe only to required model paths with appropriate update mode and cadence.

That option concerns a separate design case: A global WAN telemetry system publishes a complete 10,000-interface snapshot every 100 ms although the target is only five-minute capacity planning. The relevant control here is: Subscribe only to required model paths with appropriate update mode and cadence.

That option concerns a separate design case: A campus has out-of-band console servers but all consoles depend on the production AAA server reachable only over the failed production network. The relevant control here is: Provide an independently reachable out-of-band management network and approved emergency access process.

That option concerns a separate design case: A multicast source is reachable through an interface other than the one receiving the packet, but the router still forwards it to all receivers. The relevant control here is: Provide an independently reachable out-of-band management network and approved emergency access process.

That option concerns a separate design case: A hospital asks for guaranteed per-flow service across 300 branches and considers IntServ RSVP state on every core router. The relevant control here is: Provide an independently reachable out-of-band management network and approved emergency access process.

That option concerns a separate design case: Branch A and B redistribute external BGP into OSPF, then advertise resulting routes back into BGP at the opposite edge. The relevant control here is: Enable and validate supported BGP multipath features subject to equal-path eligibility requirements.

That option concerns a separate design case: A designer proposes unequal-cost EIGRP load sharing for two paths whose topology prevents one path from meeting the feasibility condition. The relevant control here is: Enable and validate supported BGP multipath features subject to equal-path eligibility requirements.

That option concerns a separate design case: A partner BGP session accidentally advertises a sensitive 10.0.0.0/8 internal route to an external ASN. The relevant control here is: Enable and validate supported BGP multipath features subject to equal-path eligibility requirements.

That option concerns a separate design case: A routed-access campus needs equal-cost forwarding to two distribution routers while keeping each VLAN local to one wiring closet. The relevant control here is: Align MST region name, revision, and VLAN-to-instance mapping on intended peers.

That option concerns a separate design case: A building has two independent distribution switches but hosts use the physical IP of one switch as their default gateway. The relevant control here is: Align MST region name, revision, and VLAN-to-instance mapping on intended peers.

That option concerns a separate design case: A virtualized distribution pair uses one logical control plane and engineers assume it offers separate failure domains like two chassis in different buildings. The relevant control here is: Align MST region name, revision, and VLAN-to-instance mapping on intended peers.

That option concerns a separate design case: Two industrial sites require transparent delivery of a small set of Ethernet services and reject routing between their private LANs. The relevant control here is: Design distinct supported transport interfaces and TLOC colors with centralized path policy.

That option concerns a separate design case: A site-to-site tunnel must protect financial payload confidentiality and integrity across the public internet. The relevant control here is: Design distinct supported transport interfaces and TLOC colors with centralized path policy.

That option concerns a separate design case: A bank contracts two MPLS providers but both fiber tails enter the building through the same conduit. The relevant control here is: Design distinct supported transport interfaces and TLOC colors with centralized path policy.

That option concerns a separate design case: Two business units share one management VLAN with unrestricted access to each other's routers. The relevant control here is: Correct receiver membership handling and ensure snooping querier or routing interface behavior is consistent.

That option concerns a separate design case: A campus designs priority queues only on the access switch but ignores a congested upstream WAN edge. The relevant control here is: Correct receiver membership handling and ensure snooping querier or routing interface behavior is consistent.

That option concerns a separate design case: Network management of a branch uses a VPN over its sole primary WAN, and the organization reports no way to diagnose a provider outage. The relevant control here is: Correct receiver membership handling and ensure snooping querier or routing interface behavior is consistent.

That option concerns a separate design case: A branch EIGRP router advertises remote routes back into its hub and occasionally becomes a transit path between hubs. The relevant control here is: Select feasible successors that meet EIGRP feasibility requirements and use variance only on eligible paths.

That option concerns a separate design case: An EIGRP core has routes stuck active after one WAN path fails and queries spread into many remote sites. The relevant control here is: Select feasible successors that meet EIGRP feasibility requirements and use variance only on eligible paths.

That option concerns a separate design case: A campus border is configured with two equal-cost external BGP paths but only one is installed for traffic forwarding. The relevant control here is: Select feasible successors that meet EIGRP feasibility requirements and use variance only on eligible paths.

That option concerns a separate design case: A fabric site needs a guest wireless SSID without extending the guest Layer 2 domain across the whole enterprise. The relevant control here is: Specify access switch PoE capabilities and power budget that support the APs' required negotiated power levels.

That option concerns a separate design case: A remote campus uses two distribution switches and requires nonstop gateway access during a planned supervisor replacement. The relevant control here is: Specify access switch PoE capabilities and power budget that support the APs' required negotiated power levels.

That option concerns a separate design case: An organization needs consistent segmentation across two SD-Access fabric sites connected by a routed MPLS service. The relevant control here is: Specify access switch PoE capabilities and power budget that support the APs' required negotiated power levels.