Cisco 300-420 Exam Dumps, Practice Test Questions

100% Latest & Updated Cisco 300-420 Practice Test Questions, Exam Dumps & Verified Answers!
30 Days Free Updates, Instant Download!

Cisco 300-420 Premium Bundle
$79.97
$59.98

300-420 Premium Bundle

  • Premium File: 416 Questions & Answers. Last update: Nov 9, 2026
  • Training Course: 75 Video Lectures
  • Study Guide: 812 Pages
  • Latest Questions
  • 100% Accurate Answers
  • Fast Exam Updates

300-420 Premium Bundle

Cisco 300-420 Premium Bundle
  • Premium File: 416 Questions & Answers. Last update: Nov 9, 2026
  • Training Course: 75 Video Lectures
  • Study Guide: 812 Pages
  • Latest Questions
  • 100% Accurate Answers
  • Fast Exam Updates
$79.97
$59.98

Cisco 300-420 Practice Test 55

Question 540

A wireless access-point refresh increases PoE needs above the available 802.3at class on older switches. Which specific risk makes the uncorrected design unacceptable?

  1. Undersized PoE causes reduced AP capabilities or unstable power negotiation.
  2. Independently bridging every redundant cable can cause STP blocking or accidental loops.
  3. Stretching a broad guest broadcast domain enlarges the fault and attack surface.
  4. Redundancy claims may not match actual hardware or software failover behavior.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The supported design response is to specify access switch PoE capabilities and power budget that support the APs' required negotiated power levels.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That hazard arises in a separate case: Multiple access switches connect to one distribution block through independent Layer 2 uplinks with a blocked redundant path. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

C:

That hazard arises in a separate case: A fabric site needs a guest wireless SSID without extending the guest Layer 2 domain across the whole enterprise. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

D:

That hazard arises in a separate case: A remote campus uses two distribution switches and requires nonstop gateway access during a planned supervisor replacement. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

Question 541

A partner BGP session accidentally advertises a sensitive 10.0.0.0/8 internal route to an external ASN. Which specific risk makes the uncorrected design unacceptable?

  1. A single overly permissive export can leak internal routing information outside the enterprise.
  2. A stale covering route can blackhole traffic and obscure the decommissioned subnet's true ownership.
  3. Bidirectional uncontrolled redistribution can feed prefixes back and create loops.
  4. Uncontrolled default redistribution can reroute traffic through a low-capacity branch.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The supported design response is to apply a scoped outbound prefix filter that blocks private/internal routes from the external BGP adjacency.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That hazard arises in a separate case: A campus advertises a /18 summary into the WAN but has no route for one constituent /24 after a building is decommissioned. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

C:

That hazard arises in a separate case: IS-IS adjacencies form between distribution switches, but all internal prefixes are redistributed from OSPF without loop prevention. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

D:

That hazard arises in a separate case: A branch engineer redistributes a static default route into EIGRP and advertises it to every site, overriding the intended hub defaults. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

Question 542

A routing telemetry client assumes every operational counter supports on-change updates and receives no updates on one platform. Which specific risk makes the uncorrected design unacceptable?

  1. Unbounded telemetry streams can exhaust collectors and impair network control operations.
  2. Oversampling can consume bandwidth and CPU without improving the use case.
  3. Assuming all leaves support event publication can create silent observability gaps.
  4. A transport connection alone does not prove compatible telemetry encoding.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The supported design response is to select subscription modes according to the actual leaf and device support, using periodic for counters when necessary.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That hazard arises in a separate case: A fleet telemetry design streams all available operational leaves every second over a constrained management link. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

B:

That hazard arises in a separate case: A global WAN telemetry system publishes a complete 10,000-interface snapshot every 100 ms although the target is only five-minute capacity planning. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

D:

That hazard arises in a separate case: A telemetry receiver supports gRPC but cannot decode the device's gNMI JSON_IETF path data and classifies every update as malformed. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

Question 543

A WAN team assumes DWDM wavelength multiplexing itself supplies packet-level route isolation between tenants. Which specific risk makes the uncorrected design unacceptable?

  1. Carrier-grade NAT can break designs that rely on arbitrary inbound connections.
  2. Optical wavelength separation alone does not define all end-to-end L3 security policy.
  3. Assuming GRE tunnels inherently encrypt traffic can expose sensitive payloads.
  4. Confusing the management plane with the forwarding plane creates false failover assumptions.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The supported design response is to separate optical multiplexing requirements from routing or Ethernet tenant segmentation carried over the wavelengths.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That hazard arises in a separate case: An industrial site uses 4G LTE as primary WAN, and its routing team assumes public inbound addresses remain reachable through carrier-grade NAT. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

C:

That hazard arises in a separate case: A lab requires a routed overlay carrying multicast between sites but encryption is not part of the GRE service itself. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

D:

That hazard arises in a separate case: A multisite SD-WAN deployment uses one manager for configuration and assumes manager reachability is necessary for every packet of user data. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

Question 544

A campus uses DSCP EF for voice signaling, voice media, and backup traffic, causing priority queue overload. Which specific risk makes the uncorrected design unacceptable?

  1. Shaping sets a rate envelope but does not by itself rank the packets in an output queue.
  2. Mislabeling bulk traffic as EF causes priority-queue congestion and unfairness.
  3. Oversized strict priority can starve lower-priority traffic and still harm voice.
  4. Impossible aggregate guarantees lead to unexpected arbitration or configuration rejection.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The supported design response is to classify traffic by actual application need and reserve EF treatment for suitable expedited traffic.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That hazard arises in a separate case: A branch uses a shaper on voice and bulk traffic together, and the business assumes shaping guarantees that voice always transmits first. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

C:

That hazard arises in a separate case: Video and voice both use one strict-priority queue, causing voice jitter when video surges. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

D:

That hazard arises in a separate case: A switch QoS scheduler guarantees 30% to backup traffic and 80% to voice under full congestion, exceeding possible link capacity. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

Question 545

Two campus VRRP gateways both claim master after their shared advertisement path is partitioned, and clients receive inconsistent ARP responses. Which specific risk makes the uncorrected design unacceptable?

  1. Split-master operation can cause duplicate gateway replies and intermittent forwarding.
  2. FHRP ownership without upstream awareness can blackhole traffic through the active router.
  3. A covering route can hide stale subnet withdrawal and create blackholes.
  4. Simple link aggregation does not guarantee hitless supervisor or software maintenance.

Explanation

Correct Answer

A:

The supported design response is to correct VRRP group identity, priorities, advertisement reachability, and L2 path consistency.

Incorrect Answers

B:

That hazard arises in a separate case: HSRP gateways remain reachable locally after their active router loses the only routed upstream uplink. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

C:

That hazard arises in a separate case: A site cutover retains a withdrawn /24 under an unchanged /20 campus summary and traffic follows an obsolete transit path. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

D:

That hazard arises in a separate case: A new campus design requires maintaining service during both one uplink failure and one planned software upgrade. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

Question 546

An EIGRP core has routes stuck active after one WAN path fails and queries spread into many remote sites. Which specific risk makes the uncorrected design unacceptable?

  1. Ignoring MTU discrepancy can mask forwarding issues even if adjacency is forced.
  2. Allowing a nontransit branch to act as a query/transit path increases instability and query scope.
  3. A single best-path advertisement can conceal viable alternatives during failures.
  4. Unbounded EIGRP queries across slow or unstable WAN paths can delay convergence and trigger SIA events.

Explanation

Correct Answer

D:

The supported design response is to apply EIGRP summarization, stub boundaries, and reliable connectivity to limit query scope.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That hazard arises in a separate case: Two OSPF neighbors on a routed core link are stuck in EXSTART/EXCHANGE and one endpoint uses an incompatible MTU. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

B:

That hazard arises in a separate case: A branch EIGRP router advertises remote routes back into its hub and occasionally becomes a transit path between hubs. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

C:

That hazard arises in a separate case: An iBGP route reflector sees several candidate routes to the same destination but advertises only its best path to clients. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

Question 547

An NSF-capable router pair loses a control-plane process briefly and the design assumes all neighboring routers will preserve forwarding. Which specific risk makes the uncorrected design unacceptable?

  1. Confusing LISP control messages with user traffic hides broken data-plane paths.
  2. Graceful restart only works when the adjacent topology and features support the required helper behavior.
  3. A single control-plane mapping node can delay or prevent endpoint reachability during outages.
  4. Shared control-plane or backplane faults can defeat assumed physical redundancy.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The supported design response is to plan NSF graceful-restart interoperability with compatible neighbors and realistic convergence timeouts.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That hazard arises in a separate case: An SD-Access architect assumes the fabric's LISP control plane transports all user packets like a data-plane tunnel. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

C:

That hazard arises in a separate case: A fabric control-plane node becomes unavailable and endpoint mobility updates stop at one campus site. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

D:

That hazard arises in a separate case: A virtualized distribution pair uses one logical control plane and engineers assume it offers separate failure domains like two chassis in different buildings. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

Question 548

A PIM-SM domain has active receivers but no working rendezvous-point reachability for new source registration. Which specific risk makes the uncorrected design unacceptable?

  1. Unconnected RP domains do not automatically share all active multicast sources.
  2. PIM adjacency alone does not ensure Layer 2 receiver registration.
  3. RP failure or inconsistent RP mapping can interrupt source discovery.
  4. Ignoring RPF can permit multicast loops or duplicate unwanted traffic.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The supported design response is to design reliable RP placement or supported RP redundancy with consistent mapping.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That hazard arises in a separate case: Two independent PIM-SM domains each use local rendezvous points but remote sources must be discovered across the domains. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

B:

That hazard arises in a separate case: A multicast network has active PIM neighbors but one edge switch suppresses IGMP reports after an access-layer topology change. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

D:

That hazard arises in a separate case: A multicast source is reachable through an interface other than the one receiving the packet, but the router still forwards it to all receivers. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

Question 549

A new SD-WAN site has a single edge appliance and single underlay yet is approved as redundant because controllers run in different data centers. Which specific risk makes the uncorrected design unacceptable?

  1. Raw fiber availability does not guarantee transceiver reach or optical loss budget.
  2. Controller redundancy cannot replace failed local edge hardware or access transport.
  3. Interface-up status alone does not prove the remote provider path is usable.
  4. Misassigned segment identifiers can bypass intended enterprise isolation.

Explanation

Correct Answer

B:

The supported design response is to provide independent edge and transport paths when required; treat controller redundancy as a separate failure domain.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That hazard arises in a separate case: Several data centers need high-capacity optical transport over metropolitan dark fiber without converting each tenant VLAN to an IP tunnel. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

C:

That hazard arises in a separate case: An enterprise's primary WAN circuit fails but BGP route withdrawal is delayed while the underlay interface remains up. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

D:

That hazard arises in a separate case: An SD-WAN fabric routes guest traffic into the production VPN because a new edge reused the corporate service VPN identifier. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

Question 550

A campus design requires both distribution uplinks active but the chosen topology uses classic STP on all Layer 2 connections. Which specific risk makes the uncorrected design unacceptable?

  1. Redundancy claims may not match actual hardware or software failover behavior.
  2. Arbitrary VLAN load splitting can overload the surviving device and create asymmetry.
  3. Assuming all STP redundant paths can actively forward leads to incorrect bandwidth capacity planning.
  4. Shared chassis does not automatically imply network-plane isolation without route-policy controls.

Explanation

Correct Answer

C:

The supported design response is to use a supported multi-chassis EtherChannel or routed-access design to make redundancy active without a spanning-tree loop.

Incorrect Answers

A:

That hazard arises in a separate case: A remote campus uses two distribution switches and requires nonstop gateway access during a planned supervisor replacement. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

B:

That hazard arises in a separate case: A campus with several hundred VLANs uses one active HSRP gateway for all VLANs while another distribution router remains mostly idle. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

D:

That hazard arises in a separate case: A public safety campus requires independent operations from a corporate tenant even when both use the same distribution hardware. It is not the failure mode evidenced here.

Designing Cisco Enterprise Networks (ENSLD) (300-420) Practice Tests

UP

SPECIAL OFFER: GET 10% OFF

This is ONE TIME OFFER

ExamSnap Discount Offer
Enter Your Email Address to Receive Your 10% Off Discount Code

A confirmation link will be sent to this email address to verify your login. *We value your privacy. We will not rent or sell your email address.

Download Free Demo of VCE Exam Simulator

Experience Avanset VCE Exam Simulator for yourself.

Simply submit your e-mail address below to get started with our interactive software demo of your free trial.

Free Demo Limits: In the demo version you will be able to access only first 5 questions from exam.