Microsoft MS-102 Exam Dumps, Practice Test Questions

Custom banned password policy does not include or enforce the weak phrase. would fit a different circumstance involving: Administrators want to reject a known list of weak company-themed passwords at password change. Here the actual symptom is: A user resets their password with one method despite a two-method requirement.

The response never revoked sessions or remediated credentials. is a plausible failure in another case: An attacker retains a session token after the team only changes a display name. It does not explain the current incident: A user resets their password with one method despite a two-method requirement.

The evaluator ignored another applicable Conditional Access policy or actual membership. would fit a different circumstance involving: A new Conditional Access design is blocking employees who should be outside the pilot group. Here the actual symptom is: A user resets their password with one method despite a two-method requirement.

Block unsupported legacy authentication with an appropriate security/access control. can be useful when a security team needs users to move away from an older legacy authentication mechanism. However, it does not specifically achieve: The employee unlocks access and can use the existing valid password.

Use authentication method policy targeting by security group. addresses another administrative need: Privileged staff should use an approved security-key method but standard employees may use other allowed factors. This question instead requires the outcome: The employee unlocks access and can use the existing valid password.

Use IdFix to identify and remediate supported AD attribute issues before Entra synchronization. can be useful when an enterprise is synchronizing decades-old on-premises directory accounts that have malformed proxy addresses. However, it does not specifically achieve: The employee unlocks access and can use the existing valid password.

Review account enabled state and the sign-in failure reason before changing credentials. is directed at a separate task: A cloud-only user says her password expired but the help desk needs to differentiate expiry from blocked account status. It does not produce the required configuration outcome: The employee unlocks access and can use the existing valid password.

Configure Conditional Access conditions to block legacy client authentication where supported. implements a different mechanism for: A security team needs users to move away from an older legacy authentication mechanism. It does not configure the mechanism needed here: Use supported SSPR account unlock without password reset where eligible.

Check the relevant sync cycle, connector space and source attribute mapping. is directed at a separate task: A user changes their on-premises display name but Entra never reflects the update. It does not produce the required configuration outcome: The employee unlocks access and can use the existing valid password.

The temporary code works in its valid window and expires afterward. would assess a different control. In this case it does not rule out the specific failure: A locked-out employee is forced to change a valid password when only account unlock was required.

The privileged population can register approved keys while other populations follow their policy. is evidence of another system state: Privileged staff should use an approved security-key method but standard employees may use other allowed factors. The acceptance evidence here instead is: The employee unlocks access and can use the existing valid password.

The audit record shows risk detection and the subsequent remediation state. would assess a different control. In this case it does not rule out the specific failure: A locked-out employee is forced to change a valid password when only account unlock was required.

The authentication methods policy does not permit Authenticator for the user. would fit a different circumstance involving: A tenant wants to enroll staff in Microsoft Authenticator for supported push and passwordless authentication. Here the actual symptom is: A locked-out employee is forced to change a valid password when only account unlock was required.

The sign-in diagnostic evidence was not examined before applying an unrelated fix. is a plausible failure in another case: The administrator resets the user's password without checking the sign-in event that failed. It does not explain the current incident: A locked-out employee is forced to change a valid password when only account unlock was required.

The Conditional Access policy was not targeted to the finance app or device condition. would fit a different circumstance involving: Users accessing a finance app from unmanaged devices must pass a policy condition rather than receive unrestricted access. Here the actual symptom is: A locked-out employee is forced to change a valid password when only account unlock was required.

Use approved phishing-resistant authentication methods such as FIDO2 security keys where supported. can be useful when employees must register a phishing-resistant sign-in factor instead of relying on SMS codes. However, it does not specifically achieve: A prohibited company-themed password is rejected during a test change.

Inspect Microsoft Entra sign-in logs for that event. addresses another administrative need: A user reports an interactive login failure and the admin needs the actual sign-in error and Conditional Access outcome. This question instead requires the outcome: A prohibited company-themed password is rejected during a test change.

Investigate the sync deletion event and restore source identity through the supported recovery process. can be useful when after an accidental on-premises account deletion, a synchronized user disappears from the Microsoft 365 directory. However, it does not specifically achieve: A prohibited company-themed password is rejected during a test change.

Update or require re-registration of the permitted MFA method for the affected user. is directed at a separate task: A user cannot pass MFA because a registered phone number is out of date. It does not produce the required configuration outcome: A prohibited company-themed password is rejected during a test change.

Target the privileged group with the required method and check exclusions and prerequisites. implements a different mechanism for: Privileged staff should use an approved security-key method but standard employees may use other allowed factors. It does not configure the mechanism needed here: Configure Microsoft Entra Password Protection with a custom banned password list.

Inspect identity protection risk detections and the relevant user and sign-in risk levels. is directed at a separate task: The organization must distinguish risk that a user account is compromised from risk attached to one specific login. It does not produce the required configuration outcome: A prohibited company-themed password is rejected during a test change.

Modern eligible clients continue working while legacy attempts are denied. would assess a different control. In this case it does not rule out the specific failure: New users can select a published weak company keyword as their password.

Pilot users complete the intended registration and sign-in without a broad outage. is evidence of another system state: The security team wants to avoid requiring every user to enroll in a sign-in method not yet supported on their devices. The acceptance evidence here instead is: A prohibited company-themed password is rejected during a test change.

Risky sign-ins are identified and handled according to the configured grant action. would assess a different control. In this case it does not rule out the specific failure: New users can select a published weak company keyword as their password.

Method policy targeting or registration prerequisites do not match the intended user. would fit a different circumstance involving: Privileged staff should use an approved security-key method but standard employees may use other allowed factors. Here the actual symptom is: New users can select a published weak company keyword as their password.

The team deployed a new authentication method to everyone without readiness validation. is a plausible failure in another case: A global policy blocks users on unsupported legacy devices overnight. It does not explain the current incident: New users can select a published weak company keyword as their password.

The synchronization scope included an unintended OU. would fit a different circumstance involving: Only employees in two Active Directory OUs should be synchronized to Microsoft Entra ID. Here the actual symptom is: New users can select a published weak company keyword as their password.

Inspect Microsoft Entra sign-in logs for that event. can be useful when a user reports an interactive login failure and the admin needs the actual sign-in error and Conditional Access outcome. However, it does not specifically achieve: The on-premises domain controller enforces configured banned-password controls.

Validate both authentication method registration and actual sign-in events. addresses another administrative need: A passwordless rollout requires administrators to distinguish a new registration from a completed successful sign-in. This question instead requires the outcome: The on-premises domain controller enforces configured banned-password controls.

Use synchronization run and provisioning logs to locate the failing stage. can be useful when a provisioning operator must tell whether a user failed before import, during sync transformation or at cloud export. However, it does not specifically achieve: The on-premises domain controller enforces configured banned-password controls.

Review account enabled state and the sign-in failure reason before changing credentials. is directed at a separate task: A cloud-only user says her password expired but the help desk needs to differentiate expiry from blocked account status. It does not produce the required configuration outcome: The on-premises domain controller enforces configured banned-password controls.

Filter sign-in logs by user, time, app and status then open the authentication details. implements a different mechanism for: A user reports an interactive login failure and the admin needs the actual sign-in error and Conditional Access outcome. It does not configure the mechanism needed here: Deploy Microsoft Entra Password Protection agents for on-premises Active Directory.

Install Cloud Sync provisioning agents and configure a cloud synchronization provisioning configuration. is directed at a separate task: A branch wants lightweight cloud-managed synchronization agents instead of a full dedicated Connect Sync server. It does not produce the required configuration outcome: The on-premises domain controller enforces configured banned-password controls.