Cisco 200-301 Exam Dumps, Practice Test Questions

Encryption protects wireless frames, but authenticated stations can still communicate with each other unless peer traffic is independently restricted.

Hiding the name is not client isolation; previously configured clients may still associate and exchange traffic.

Segmentation from other networks does not inherently block two stations that share a WLAN/VLAN.

DHCP runs only after successful WLAN security association and does not repair an invalid PSK or cipher in the four-way handshake.

Additional RF power cannot make mismatched shared secrets and encryption algorithms yield a valid WPA2 handshake.

Changing the advertised name does not reconcile the mismatched PSK and cipher values the client is using.

The clients have already associated and authenticated, so a PSK edit does not correct the wrong VLAN or blocked DHCP path.

Beacon rate affects discovery overhead, not subnet selection or connectivity from VLAN 40 to the expected DHCP server.

Station-to-station guest policy is not a substitute for the correctly mapped VLAN and routable DHCP relay or server path.

PSK controls authentication after discovery; it cannot cause an administratively disabled WLAN to appear in client scans.

Gateway configuration is Layer 3 and cannot advertise a radio network that is not enabled.

VLAN reassignment affects client data placement, not the WLAN enablement or broadcast policy that hides the SSID.

Longer credentials improve authentication resistance but do not alter the packet scheduling and priority policy for voice.

An SSID label does not address contention-driven packet scheduling, latency or jitter.

Disabling wireless QoS can remove appropriate voice traffic prioritization and does not meet the low-latency requirement.

Encryption authenticates/protects traffic but does not by itself prevent one associated guest station from reaching another.

Both guests may still be placed in one new VLAN and exchange peer frames unless a separate isolation control is used.

Lease renewal frequency does not enforce the requirement to block local station-to-station communication.

BSSID identifies a particular radio BSS and can change while roaming; it is not the common WLAN SSID to configure for the guest service.

AP names serve infrastructure administration and do not by themselves create the same advertised guest WLAN.

The policy-profile name is not the SSID clients see in network scans or save for roaming.

TKIP-only protection does not meet the expressly requested AES-CCMP data-confidentiality requirement.

WEP is an older insecure cipher and does not deliver modern WPA2 AES-CCMP protection.

A network name does not encrypt wireless traffic or replace the requested AES security mode.

SSID naming can help visitors select a WLAN but does not move authenticated client traffic to the required guest VLAN.

Cipher changes alter 802.11 security but do not determine VLAN/subnet placement once clients authenticate.

RF profile changes affect radio parameters, not the WLAN-to-policy-profile VLAN association at fault.

DHCP parameters cannot make a WLAN visible over the air when the relevant WLAN or radio policy is disabled.

Authentication credentials matter once clients discover and attempt to join the WLAN, not to the absence of beacons.

The controller management address does not directly activate the WLAN on the intended AP radios.

A VLAN mask cannot show whether the WLAN rejected the client in authentication or association.

Power evidence may establish AP uptime, but not the particular client security/policy rejection on this WLAN.

Changing the WLAN identity is disruptive and does not provide the requested read-only GUI evidence for association/security troubleshooting.