Cisco 200-301 Exam Dumps, Practice Test Questions

OSPF process configuration lists intended protocol settings but is not proof that the default route is installed in the active RIB.

An interface description helps identify a circuit but does not prove an IP default route is usable in the RIB.

Resolver settings affect name lookup but not the installed default route used to forward unmatched destination IP packets.

The via address is an adjacent forwarding router, not the OSPF-learned 192.0.2.0/26 destination.

The O letter identifies route protocol, while the following prefix is the destination match.

Administrative distance/metric describes route preference, not a CIDR destination prefix.

255.255.255.224 has three one-bits in the final octet, giving a 27-bit prefix, not /26.

255.255.255.0 has only 24 network bits and defines a larger /24 subnet.

0.0.0.63 is the inverse wildcard of a /26 subnet mask, often used for ACL matching, not the requested dotted-decimal subnet mask.

Connected routes appear with route code C, not the OSPF interarea O IA indicator.

A manually configured static route uses code S even if its administrative distance was manually increased to 110.

EIGRP external routes are designated D EX, not O IA; the letters reflect different routing protocols.

The route prefix length is explicitly /16 and is not the bracket’s second number.

There is only one distance value, 110, in this notation; 20 is the metric.

The route metric does not count physical forwarding interfaces or ECMP members.

EIGRP composite metrics and OSPF costs use different scales; the larger raw EIGRP metric is not a cross-protocol advantage.

External EIGRP is not inherently more preferred than a same-prefix OSPF route; administrative distance decides between these sources.

Equal prefix length does not make routes from different protocols automatically eligible for equal-cost multipath.

IPv6 unicast routing uses matching destination prefixes; a default route loses to valid installed more-specific routes.

The /48 matches this packet but has fewer matching high-order bits than the installed /56 and /64 routes. Configuration order is not the forwarding selection rule.

The /56 contains the destination yet is less specific than the /64 covering the exact `:301` subnet.

A default route matches all addresses, but it is the least-specific prefix. The installed 10.0.0.0/8 entry is a longer matching prefix for 10.201.3.4 and takes precedence.

The 10.0.0.0/8 network covers addresses from 10.0.0.0 through 10.255.255.255, including the destination. A valid installed route and reachable next hop are available.

Equal-cost multipath does not combine a /8 route with a /0 default for a matching packet. The more-specific /8 is selected, so the default next hop is not used for this destination.

Static routes normally have a nonzero default distance and cannot bypass next-hop reachability through an invented distance zero.

A static configuration does not automatically enable or originate OSPF announcements.

The existence of a static route does not make a remote prefix directly connected or solve the next-hop recursion loop.

The remote host is beyond the next-hop router and is not the on-link ARP target when the route specifies a reachable next-hop IP.

The remote network identifier is a routing prefix, not the adjacent router’s Ethernet interface address.

The subnet mask is not a valid unicast ARP target address.

Administrative distance compares sources competing for the same prefix during installation; it does not override a more-specific installed route at forwarding time.

ECMP concerns equal-cost eligible paths to the same prefix, not two unequal prefix lengths.

Static routes can coexist with OSPF routes for different masks when each route is installed and reachable.