How to Pass the AZ-204 Exam Becoming a Certified Azure Developer

The AZ-204 exam encapsulates a constellation of technical domains, each demanding nuanced comprehension. Azure compute services, including App Services, Azure Functions, and Kubernetes-managed clusters, constitute the foundational layer. Candidates must internalize deployment models, scaling paradigms, and the interplay between stateless and stateful workloads. The exam emphasizes not only the mechanics but also the architectural rationale behind design decisions, inviting examinees to reason through performance, cost, and resiliency trade-offs.

Storage solutions constitute another intricate domain. Azure Blob, Table, Queue, and File storage each possess idiosyncratic characteristics, access patterns, and security considerations. For instance, configuring replication strategies for global distribution or integrating storage with serverless workflows challenges both cognitive dexterity and practical know-how. Candidates who meticulously explore storage tiering, lifecycle management, and ephemeral versus persistent storage options gain a strategic advantage, as such knowledge frequently underpins scenario-based questions.

Networking is an often-underestimated component of AZ-204 preparation. Understanding Virtual Networks, subnets, service endpoints, and private link connectivity equips candidates to architect secure and performant applications. Hybrid networking scenarios, including VPN gateways and ExpressRoute integration, require the ability to synthesize cloud and on-premises paradigms seamlessly. Questions may probe comprehension of network security groups, application gateways, and firewall rules, demanding both conceptual clarity and familiarity with Azure’s interface.

Leveraging Development Tools and SDKs

Developers confronting AZ-204 must become conversant with the full spectrum of Azure SDKs and tooling. Visual Studio and Visual Studio Code remain indispensable, offering integrated debugging, Azure extensions, and streamlined deployment pipelines. Candidates should also explore Azure CLI, PowerShell modules, and REST API invocations, ensuring fluency across both GUI and code-based interactions. Hands-on engagement with SDKs enhances one’s ability to translate theoretical concepts into actionable scripts, which often proves decisive in performance-oriented exam questions.

Microservices patterns and event-driven architectures are likewise paramount. Azure Service Bus, Event Grid, and Event Hubs present real-world messaging and orchestration scenarios. Exam preparation should entail constructing small-scale prototypes, simulating event flows, and troubleshooting message delivery anomalies. Such experimentation cultivates an instinctive understanding of latency, throughput, and delivery guarantees—elements frequently tested in scenario-based questions.

Mastering Security and Identity in Azure

Security and identity management form a thematic backbone of AZ-204. Candidates must navigate Azure Active Directory, role-based access control, managed identities, and secure key management with confidence. Understanding conditional access policies, multi-factor authentication, and identity federation scenarios is crucial. By creating practical exercises that integrate Key Vault secrets with Azure Functions or App Service deployments, candidates acquire an intuitive grasp of both security best practices and operational mechanics.

Compliance and governance considerations are interwoven throughout exam content. Concepts such as resource tagging, policy enforcement, and role auditing often appear indirectly within case studies. Candidates who preemptively simulate compliance scenarios—such as restricting data access based on regulatory requirements—develop an analytical lens that proves invaluable when interpreting complex exam narratives.

Optimizing Performance and Monitoring Applications

Performance tuning and observability represent advanced facets of the AZ-204 skill set. Azure Monitor, Application Insights, and Log Analytics enable developers to glean operational telemetry and detect anomalies proactively. Understanding metrics, diagnostic settings, and alert rules empowers candidates to design systems resilient to fluctuating workloads or unforeseen failures. Constructing monitoring dashboards and simulating incident scenarios instills practical intuition, bridging the gap between conceptual awareness and operational excellence.

Caching strategies and distributed state management also demand attention. Utilizing Azure Cache for Redis, session state configurations, and performance-enhancing design patterns enhances application responsiveness. By experimenting with cache invalidation, concurrency controls, and throughput optimization, candidates internalize best practices that often surface in scenario-based problem-solving questions.

Practicing Exam Simulations with Cognitive Discipline

While knowledge accumulation is essential, exam simulation fosters cognitive endurance and decision-making acumen. Timed practice exams cultivate a strategic mindset, compelling candidates to triage questions, prioritize high-yield sections, and navigate complex case studies efficiently. Building mental frameworks for evaluating multiple-choice options—identifying distractors, interpreting scenario context, and discerning subtle semantic cues—can significantly elevate exam performance.

Developing a personalized study cadence amplifies retention. Short, intensive sessions interspersed with reflective review periods enable candidates to internalize intricate concepts. Integrating active recall techniques, flashcards, and mnemonic devices for frequently tested topics—such as Azure Functions triggers, Cosmos DB consistency models, or managed identity scopes—fortifies long-term memory and reduces cognitive fatigue.

Embracing Hands-On Experimentation

Practical experimentation constitutes the most potent differentiator between superficial familiarity and deep mastery. Candidates are encouraged to construct sample applications, integrate services, and troubleshoot unexpected behavior. Deploying multi-tier applications with App Services, Functions, and Cosmos DB interactions reveals nuances that theoretical study alone cannot convey. Additionally, configuring automated CI/CD pipelines in Azure DevOps or GitHub Actions exposes candidates to real-world operational workflows, fortifying their problem-solving agility.

Simulating failure conditions, such as scaling limits, network latency, or permission errors, equips candidates with a troubleshooting mindset. By intentionally provoking errors and diagnosing root causes, learners cultivate a resilient, analytical approach that transcends rote memorization. This methodology proves particularly advantageous when addressing interactive or drag-and-drop exam components, where comprehension of underlying mechanics is paramount.

Strategic Approaches to Exam Day

Exam strategy is equally pivotal as technical knowledge. Prioritizing questions based on familiarity, carefully parsing narrative details, and flagging uncertain items for review optimizes time allocation. Candidates should approach the case study with an analytical lens, dissecting dependencies, business logic, and potential failure points. Employing a systematic process—reading the scenario, identifying requirements, and mapping solutions—reduces cognitive overload and enhances accuracy.

Maintaining mental composure is critical. Azure exams demand sustained focus, and minor lapses in attention can propagate errors in complex problem-solving questions. Pre-exam routines, including adequate rest, nutrition, and mental rehearsal, contribute significantly to performance outcomes. Confidence stems not from overconfidence but from diligent preparation, iterative practice, and familiarity with the Azure ecosystem’s idiosyncrasies.

The Enduring Value Beyond Certification

Though passing AZ-204 confers a recognized credential, the intrinsic value extends far beyond certification. Candidates emerge with refined skills in cloud-native application design, security implementation, and operational monitoring. The structured preparation journey fosters analytical thinking, practical experimentation, and mastery of a sophisticated, dynamic platform. Even professionals who no longer actively develop software derive substantial benefit from the experience, remaining conversant with emerging technologies, architectural paradigms, and service integration strategies.

The AZ-204 journey exemplifies the intersection of cognitive rigor and practical experimentation. It challenges candidates to transcend memorization, cultivate technical fluency, and develop an adaptive mindset applicable across diverse enterprise scenarios. Ultimately, success derives from a harmonious blend of conceptual understanding, hands-on experimentation, and strategic navigation of exam demands.

Certification preparation should be viewed as a stepping stone toward enduring proficiency. Engaging with Azure’s evolving services, exploring new SDKs, and revisiting architectural patterns ensures sustained relevance in a rapidly transforming landscape. The iterative cycle of learning, experimentation, and reflection nurtures a mindset that values both innovation and methodical analysis.

Professionals who embrace this philosophy cultivate not only technical expertise but also the cognitive flexibility required to thrive amid continuous technological evolution. By integrating experiential learning with strategic study methods, candidates achieve a synthesis of knowledge and intuition that persists long after the exam concludes. In this light, AZ-204 preparation is not an isolated endeavor but a gateway to a broader odyssey in cloud computing mastery.

Strategic Mastery of Core Azure Services for Developers

The contemporary Azure Developer landscape is an intricate tapestry of cloud-native paradigms, orchestration techniques, and dynamic service interplays. The AZ-204 exam emphasizes a quintet of critical domains, each demanding a nuanced grasp of both conceptual frameworks and pragmatic implementation. Approaching preparation with a strategic lens, rather than rote memorization, empowers aspirants to navigate the scenario-laden assessments with acumen and agility.

Developing Azure Compute Solutions

Compute solutions constitute the bedrock of the Azure Developer certification. This domain encompasses approximately a quarter of the examination’s content, underscoring the necessity for fluency in Web Apps, App Service Plans, Azure Functions, and containerized deployments. Developers must cultivate experiential understanding through iterative experimentation—deploying WebApps across varied pricing tiers, orchestrating auto-scaling mechanisms, and managing lifecycle events for continuous versus triggered WebJobs. A granular comprehension of operational nuances, such as threading behaviors, concurrency models, and cold start latency in Functions, is indispensable. Mastery in this domain transcends mere configuration; it demands anticipatory insight into performance bottlenecks and cost-effective deployment strategies.

Architecting Robust Storage Solutions

Storage solutions retain their critical stature in AZ-204, despite subtle reductions in relative weightage. Developers must navigate a spectrum spanning Blob storage, Table storage, Cosmos DB, SQL Database, and caching mechanisms like Redis Cache. Cosmos DB, in particular, is a locus of complexity, blending distributed database paradigms with multi-faceted consistency models—Strong, Bounded Staleness, Consistent Prefix, and Eventual. Beyond memorization, candidates must internalize criteria for selecting the optimal model based on application latency tolerance, throughput expectations, and transactional integrity requirements. Additionally, integrating storage solutions with compute environments demands an understanding of hybrid access patterns, latency mitigation strategies, and storage-tiering optimizations.

Implementing Security Mechanisms

Security is the fulcrum where conceptual clarity intersects operational competence. Azure mandates a meticulous grasp of encryption protocols such as Always Encrypted, Transparent Data Encryption, and integration with Azure Key Vault for cryptographic key lifecycle management. Developers must be proficient in the orchestration of authentication flows, encompassing OAuth 2.0, OpenID Connect, and multifaceted Azure Active Directory (AAD) constructs. The subtleties of managed identities, B2B and B2C federation, and Privileged Identity Management delineate the threshold between proficient and exceptional candidates. Scenario-based questions often probe the ability to enforce conditional access, role-based permissions, and secure service-to-service communications, necessitating both theoretical knowledge and hands-on configuration experience.

Monitoring, Troubleshooting, and Optimization

Adeptness in monitoring and optimization constitutes a pivotal domain. Azure’s Application Insights provides an extensive telemetry ecosystem, enabling developers to scrutinize user interactions, retention patterns, funnel efficacy, and anomaly detection. The capacity to synthesize telemetry data into actionable insights is critical for real-world application resilience. Aspiring Azure Developers must familiarize themselves with synthetic monitoring, alert rules, log queries, and distributed tracing. Proficiency in diagnosing performance degradations, identifying resource contention, and recommending cost-effective optimizations frequently distinguishes candidates in the exam environment and in professional deployment scenarios.

Integrating Azure Services and Third-Party Ecosystems

The domain of integration is a testament to Azure’s versatility. Messaging frameworks such as Event Grid, Event Hubs, and Service Bus exemplify event-driven paradigms, each with distinct guarantees regarding message delivery, ordering, and filtering capabilities. Candidates must understand subscription filters, dead-letter queues, and idempotent message handling. Logic Apps and Azure Functions serve as orchestration conduits for connecting Azure-native services with third-party APIs, emphasizing the developer’s role in crafting end-to-end automated workflows. Proficiency in API connectors, adaptive error handling, and webhook-based integrations is not merely advantageous but requisite for mastery in both exam and enterprise contexts.

Leveraging the Azure Sandbox Environment

Strategic utilization of Azure’s sandbox environment is a force multiplier for candidates. Microsoft provisions $200 in credits for new accounts, facilitating the simulation of enterprise-scale scenarios without incurring financial risk. Developers are encouraged to architect microcosms of production architectures, deploying multi-tier applications, experimenting with autoscaling policies, and integrating event-driven pipelines. Fiscal prudence is essential; judicious decommissioning of resources ensures that the sandbox remains an optimal testing ground. Immersive, iterative experimentation within this environment accelerates cognitive internalization, transforming abstract principles into intuitive problem-solving acumen.

Crafting Scenario-Based Competence

Scenario-based competence is the nexus of examination success. The AZ-204 exam rarely tests isolated facts; instead, it presents composite scenarios requiring synthesis of compute, storage, security, and integration paradigms. Candidates must cultivate the capacity to weigh trade-offs, predict operational outcomes, and select optimal architectural patterns under constraints. For example, designing a serverless function that consumes messages from Event Hubs while persisting data in Cosmos DB requires simultaneous consideration of scaling, latency, cost, and security—a multidimensional evaluation that typifies professional practice and the exam’s expectations.

Automation and DevOps Integration

The Azure Developer domain is inseparable from DevOps principles. Automation, through Azure CLI, PowerShell, ARM templates, and Bicep, streamlines deployment, configuration, and governance. Continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, orchestrated via Azure DevOps or GitHub Actions, facilitate rapid iteration, robust testing, and rollback strategies. Candidates must internalize the nuances of pipeline orchestration, artifact management, and environment segregation. Mastery of these tools enables automated provisioning of resources, repeatable deployments, and consistent operational practices, reinforcing both exam preparation and professional efficacy.

Performance Tuning and Cost Optimization

Performance tuning and cost optimization demand both analytical acumen and practical dexterity. Candidates must recognize the interdependencies between resource allocation, autoscaling thresholds, and transactional throughput. Analytical tools, such as Azure Monitor Metrics and Application Insights, provide actionable intelligence on latency, CPU utilization, memory consumption, and network throughput. Cost management requires an understanding of pricing tiers, reserved instances, and serverless consumption models. Strategic application of these insights allows developers to design solutions that balance performance imperatives with fiscal responsibility—a principle echoed across cloud-native architecture best practices.

Real-World Application Patterns

Understanding real-world application patterns consolidates theoretical knowledge. Developers must engage with microservices architectures, event-driven processing, and decoupled service orchestration. Patterns such as CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation), event sourcing, and pub/sub messaging underpin scalable, resilient solutions. Exam scenarios often encapsulate these patterns within practical use cases, requiring candidates to analyze trade-offs, anticipate failure modes, and implement robust error-handling strategies. Immersive exposure to these patterns, coupled with iterative experimentation in the sandbox environment, cultivates both examination readiness and operational competence.

Security Beyond Basics

Beyond foundational security concepts, advanced protection mechanisms are increasingly emphasized. Developers must navigate identity federation, token caching strategies, secure API gateways, and conditional access policies. Implementing least-privilege access, audit logging, and encryption at rest and in transit are imperative. Scenario-based assessments often integrate these elements with compute and storage operations, compelling candidates to synthesize multi-domain knowledge. Security fluency, therefore, extends beyond memorization; it demands an anticipatory mindset and proactive design philosophy.

Continuous Learning and Knowledge Reinforcement

Continuous learning is an axiomatic component of Azure mastery. The cloud landscape evolves with relentless velocity, introducing new services, API enhancements, and architectural patterns. Candidates are encouraged to cultivate habitual engagement with official documentation, sandbox experimentation, and community discourse. Knowledge reinforcement through iterative practice, mock assessments, and post-deployment reflection consolidates theoretical constructs into operational expertise. This iterative methodology ensures that learning is both persistent and adaptable, equipping developers to navigate emergent technologies with confidence.

Cognitive Strategies for Exam Success

Cognitive strategies amplify preparation efficacy. Time management, scenario deconstruction, and mental modeling enable candidates to navigate complex questions efficiently. Employing schema-based memory techniques, such as mind-mapping service interdependencies, aids in rapid recall during the exam. Additionally, stress inoculation through simulated testing conditions fosters resilience and cognitive flexibility. These strategies, while ancillary to technical knowledge, often delineate successful candidates from those who merely understand individual components.

Event-Driven Architecture Proficiency

Event-driven architectures encapsulate the evolution of modern application design. Proficiency in this domain necessitates understanding event sourcing, message deduplication, delivery guarantees, and orchestration of complex workflows. Candidates must reconcile ephemeral event streams with persistent storage requirements, ensuring idempotency and eventual consistency. Mastery involves configuring Event Grid, Event Hubs, and Service Bus to interoperate seamlessly, leveraging Logic Apps or Functions for automation and integration. Exam scenarios frequently simulate these challenges, testing the candidate’s ability to implement scalable, reliable, and maintainable solutions.

Integrating Third-Party Services

Third-party service integration exemplifies practical enterprise requirements. APIs, webhooks, SaaS connectors, and authentication protocols necessitate a sophisticated understanding of inter-system communication. Logic Apps and Functions serve as intermediaries, orchestrating data flows, event triggers, and error handling. Candidates must anticipate latency, fault tolerance, and message serialization concerns, synthesizing these considerations into holistic, resilient solutions. Proficiency in this domain directly translates to real-world competence, bridging theoretical understanding and applied execution.

A Holistic Preparation Paradigm

Strategic mastery of AZ-204 content entails a holistic, multi-dimensional approach. Compute, storage, security, monitoring, and integration are interdependent pillars that demand simultaneous cultivation. Leveraging Azure’s sandbox, embracing iterative experimentation, and internalizing event-driven and DevOps paradigms fosters operational fluency. Cognitive strategies, scenario-based practice, and continuous learning consolidate theoretical understanding into practical competence. Ultimately, the aspirant who navigates these domains with diligence, foresight, and analytical acumen emerges not only exam-ready but equipped to architect resilient, scalable, and secure cloud-native solutions in professional practice.

Cognitive Acumen in Exam Navigation

Success in the AZ-204 exam transcends rote memorization. It demands an orchestrated application of cognitive acumen, where metacognition—the awareness of one’s understanding—plays a pivotal role. Candidates benefit from cultivating an internal dialogue, continuously questioning their assumptions, evaluating the plausibility of each option, and calibrating mental models against Azure’s operational paradigms. This reflective approach mitigates the risk of overconfidence and enhances adaptive problem-solving under time-constrained conditions.

Temporal Allocation and Strategic Pacing

Time management is not merely about speed; it is a nuanced balance between depth and breadth of coverage. Each section of the AZ-204 demands differentiated pacing. For instance, complex case studies benefit from a front-loaded reading strategy, extracting critical data points before engaging with questions. Simultaneously, straightforward multiple-choice items can often be answered through rapid pattern recognition and elimination heuristics. Developing a temporal rhythm, where high-value questions are prioritized without sacrificing peripheral comprehension, is integral to maximizing scoring potential.

Mnemonics and Cognitive Encoding

Advanced mnemonic techniques facilitate durable knowledge retention. Beyond conventional flashcards, candidates can employ method-of-loci strategies, visual mind-maps, and associative chaining to encode Azure constructs. Mapping workflows such as Logic Apps orchestration, Cosmos DB partitioning, or Key Vault key rotation into spatial or narrative schemas enhances recall under exam duress. Repeated retrieval practice consolidates long-term memory, transforming ephemeral familiarity into reliable expertise.

Heuristic Approaches to Multiple-Choice Items

Multiple-choice questions in AZ-204 often exploit subtle distinctions. Developing heuristics—mental shortcuts informed by experience—enables rapid differentiation between superficially plausible distractors. For example, questions regarding managed identities versus service principals can be approached by verifying whether the scenario entails user-independent authentication or delegated access. Heuristics must be continuously refined through practice tests and scenario simulations, embedding a dynamic, context-aware decision-making framework.

Case Study Dissection and Prioritization

Case studies are deliberately intricate, weaving technical, operational, and policy dimensions into a cohesive narrative. Candidates should adopt a methodical dissection approach: identify stakeholder roles, map data flows, isolate compliance requisites, and annotate environmental constraints. Selective extraction of question-relevant details minimizes cognitive overload while preserving essential context. Visualization techniques, such as tabular representations of resource configurations or workflow diagrams for LogicApps, accelerate comprehension and reduce misinterpretation.

Experiential Immersion in Azure Environments

Hands-on experience remains the linchpin of proficiency. Creating, deploying, and debugging WebApps, WebJobs, and containerized workloads enables internalization of procedural sequences. Understanding Azure Resource Manager (ARM) templates, deployment slots, scaling policies, and logging mechanisms cultivates procedural fluency. Experiential immersion converts abstract documentation into operational intuition, enhancing confidence and accuracy during scenario-based questioning.

Security Constructs and Policy Integration

Mastery of security paradigms is indispensable. Azure security encompasses cryptographic protocols, Key Vault integration, managed identities, and Azure Active Directory constructs. Candidates must comprehend how encryption, identity provisioning, and access policies intersect with application functionality. Questions often probe not only technical correctness but also policy adherence and operational best practices. Familiarity with security constructs fosters an anticipatory mindset, where potential risks are preemptively mitigated within exam scenarios.

Navigating Exam Evolution and Blueprint Shifts

Staying current with exam blueprint modifications is crucial. The transition from AZ-203 to AZ-204 introduced nuanced shifts in topic emphasis, such as increased focus on compute mechanisms and reduced coverage of storage paradigms. The deliberate omission of Azure Kubernetes Service, while retaining Docker container deployments, exemplifies the fluidity of exam scope. Candidates must regularly consult official documentation, assimilate change notes, and recalibrate study priorities accordingly to ensure alignment with the most recent expectations.

Integrative Scenario Analysis

Scenario-based questions assess the candidate’s ability to integrate diverse Azure services into coherent solutions. For example, a workflow may necessitate orchestrating Logic Apps to trigger Web Jobs based on Cosmos DB events while enforcing access policies via managed identities. Successful navigation requires simultaneous mental tracking of service interdependencies, operational workflows, and security implications. Practicing integrative scenarios cultivates holistic comprehension and the capacity to anticipate system interactions.

Cognitive Load Management

Excessive cognitive load is a subtle but pervasive challenge during timed assessments. Techniques such as chunking information, hierarchical structuring of concepts, and intermittent micro-breaks within practice sessions optimize mental bandwidth. Recognizing and mitigating cognitive fatigue preserves analytical acuity, reducing errors stemming from oversight or rushed reasoning. Visualization and diagrammatic reasoning further offload working memory, allowing candidates to focus on critical decision-making rather than superficial details.

Precision in Documentation and Study Tools

Accurate, well-organized study notes act as cognitive scaffolding. Candidates should compile succinct summaries of Web Apps deployment patterns, Cosmos DB indexing strategies, Logic Apps triggers, and Application Insights telemetry interpretation. Interactive tools, such as lab sandboxes, simulation environments, and practice exams, complement documentation by providing immediate feedback loops. The iterative cycle of documentation, practice, and reflection consolidates knowledge and reinforces conceptual clarity.

Metacognitive Reflection Post-Practice

Reflection after practice sessions catalyzes continuous improvement. Analyzing errors, understanding the rationale behind correct responses, and identifying recurring knowledge gaps sharpen self-awareness and adaptive learning capacity. Metacognitive reflection converts passive exposure into active mastery, enhancing the ability to navigate unforeseen scenarios during the actual exam.

Psychological Preparedness and Stress Mitigation

Equally critical is psychological readiness. Stress can impair working memory and decision-making. Techniques such as deep-breathing exercises, mindfulness meditation, and structured rehearsal of exam scenarios bolster resilience. Establishing a pre-exam routine, including familiarization with the testing interface and timing strategies, reduces cognitive friction and fosters a composed, confident mindset.

Adaptive Learning and Continuous Skill Refinement

The AZ-204 certification is not merely a static evaluation; it is an invitation to perpetual skill refinement. Candidates are encouraged to engage with emerging Azure features, preview documentation updates, and explore new service integrations. Adaptive learning—where study strategies evolve in response to feedback and technological shifts—ensures long-term relevance and mastery beyond the examination context.

Strategic Exploitation of Exam Resources

Leveraging exam-oriented resources judiciously enhances performance. Simulated labs, practice exams, and scenario walkthroughs serve dual purposes: reinforcing technical knowledge and cultivating familiarity with question phrasing and complexity. Systematic engagement with these resources, combined with careful review of errors, transforms initial uncertainty into informed, strategic confidence.

Cognitive Synergy Between Theory and Practice

Ultimately, AZ-204 success emerges from the synergy of theoretical understanding and practical competence. Conceptual mastery of Azure services, combined with procedural dexterity, allows candidates to navigate both abstract and applied dimensions of the exam. This duality—cognitive and operational—ensures that knowledge is not merely memorized but internalized, adaptable, and actionable in diverse professional contexts.

Conclusion

The AZ-204 examination demands a multidimensional approach, integrating technical knowledge, cognitive strategy, practical experience, and psychological readiness. By employing mnemonic techniques, targeted case study analysis, hands-on experimentation, security comprehension, and reflective learning, candidates elevate their proficiency and confidence. Mastery of exam dynamics, combined with a disciplined study regimen and adaptive cognitive strategies, positions aspirants not only to succeed in certification but to thrive within the dynamic, evolving landscape of Microsoft Azure development.

ExamSnap's Microsoft AZ-204 Practice Test Questions and Exam Dumps, study guide, and video training course are complicated in premium bundle. The Exam Updated are monitored by Industry Leading IT Trainers with over 15 years of experience, Microsoft AZ-204 Exam Dumps and Practice Test Questions cover all the Exam Objectives to make sure you pass your exam easily.